Dear University of California students, staff and faculty: Thank you. As a California parent, I am grateful for your courage in standing up to this administration in the massive walkout you’ve planned for tomorrow, September 24th.

You are wise. Without you, tuition would soon rise to a point where most Californians couldn’t afford it. Public higher education in this state used to be free–and now it’s going to cost more than a new small car every year? Pretty soon a UC bachelor’s degree will cost the equivalent of four luxury cars. Who can afford that? Thank you for throwing yourselves into the trenches against the Schwarzeneggers and the Yudofs who want to turn public higher education into a subsidy for the rich.

You are compassionate. You are demanding that cuts not fall on employees earning less than $40,000. Thank you for demanding fairness, and asking that–if cuts are actually necessary– the thousands of wealthiest UC employees dig a little deeper.

You are honest. The reality is that undergraduate tuition subsidizes every other activity in the university, and the administration has billions of reserve funds. As Bob Samuels says, “UC does not have a budget crisis; it has a crisis in priorities.” The savage 40% tuition hike–while raising class sizes, cutting sections, etc–is really a massive increase in the tax on undergraduates represented by cross-subsidy. Thank you for asking that education come first.

You are fighting racism in admissions. Economic discrimination is always wrong in a democracy, but in our state it falls much harder on African-Americans and Hispanics.

You are fighting racism in university employment. Faculty salaries in the humanities already offer an unbelievably low return on the ten years it takes to get a PhD (if you’re lucky, around age 35 or 40 you’ll get a job that pays you $55,000, or less than a bartender). This means that mostly persons from wealthier backgrounds can afford to become professors–a form of economic discrimination that explains why university faculties are among the most disproportionately white workforces in the country.

You make us think. It seems the administration has been trying to mislead the media with the statistic that UC professors make an average over $100,000. Funny thing about averages, though. If your neighbor earns a million dollars a year, and you earn $15,000–guess what? Your average salary is half a million bucks! The fact is that “average” salary includes a lot of people making huge, inflated salaries, and a lot more folks barely scraping by.

Your typical humanities prof–you know, the person they show as a prof in the movies, talking to you about history, culture, or philosophy–puts in about ten years getting the Ph.D., then another three or four years on temporary appointment, before even starting a tenure track job.

Even worse? Most university teachers aren’t tenured profs at all. Most courses are taught by grad students or folks on temporary, part time and nontenurable appointments. Most of these faculty make fifty or a hundred dollars per student per year. Thank you for inspiring us to ask: If it’s not going to the persons teaching our students: where’s our money going?

In solidarity, Marc Bousquet

UC Student Association (pdf)
UC Faculty blog (FAQ, teach-in materials, etc)
UC Staff one-day strike in solidarity



Recently:


Comments


This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009 at 10:53 am and is filed under "quality" and other fighting words, Emile, academic labor system, administrators, corporate university, current events, feminization of the humanities, graduate education, real institutional sleaze, solidarity and a tiered workforce, tuition gold rush, university-corporate partnerships. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Comments so far


  1. Alfred Guy on September 24, 2009 6:18 pm

    I appreciate most of these points, but the one about racism in hiring doesn’t really make sense. If the jobs pay too little to make them a good investment for non-white candidates, it’s hardly worth calling it racism to say that they’re disproportionately represented. Let’s save declarations of racism for the unfair distribution of worthwhile goods.

  2. Marc Bousquet on September 24, 2009 7:04 pm

    Thanks for responding to this point, which I’ve raised several times before. Even in high-traffic x-postings at the Chronicle and The Valve, though, this is the one observation that almost no one comments on. Even if I’m wrong, that’s too bad, because it’s really worth thinking about.

    Perhaps I didn’t explain myself clearly because–as you note–a lot was going on in this post, and because I’ve made the observation in more detailed fashion elsewhere.

    It’s a question–at the very least–of the wealth gap. If the wages are driven down to the point of philanthropy (so that only the wealthiest can afford to make the choice to discount their wages in this way), that will have race-specific consequences to the extent that the wealth gap is race-specific.

    Whether you agree with me or not on that, it’s worth asking why police departments are commonly more racially diverse than college faculties.

  3. Carl Whithaus on September 24, 2009 9:28 pm

    Marc
    Thanks for your support. 5,000 rallied at Berkeley, 1,000 at Davis and 1,000 at UCLA. Buildings still occupied in the evening at UCLA and Santa Cruz according to the twitter feed.

    Students, staff, and faculty say “OUR UNIVERSITY” http://twitgoo.com/3r1ja
    http://twitgoo.com/3r1g6

    Why does Yudof get interviewed in the NY Times today? What about Bob Samuels? Or Josh Clover?

    Carl
    UC Davis
    http://twitter.com/carl_whithaus

Name

Email

Website

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Share your wisdom