My son Emile Amitai arrived on Valentine’s Day at 5 am. To the best of my knowledge based on our brief acquaintance, he is healthy, intelligent, big-boned and goodlooking. If all goes as planned, eighteen years from now he’ll be a big man on campus somewhere.
But what will that campus look like?
If current trends continue, that campus will closely resemble another American institution—an upscale suburban shopping mall, with highly standardized “products,” a student work force, degraded floor managers wearing pocket protectors, an expensive yet disposable physical plant, and corporate executives designing everyone else’s work process at a great distance from the shop floor.
The “faculty” will be 87% contingent and upper-division undergraduates will do much of the teaching of lower-division students.
Tenure and curriculum will be the privilege of administrators.
At most institutions, whole fields of the liberal arts—philosophy, history, music, literature–will no longer be represented by departments.
Basketball coaches will earn as much as $10 million a year, and teaching 8 classes a year as a “part-timer” will pay less than the minimum wage.
Ten percent of undergraduates will not be working at all, but the remaining 90% serving their lattes, correcting their papers, and doing their laundry and nails will be working 40 hours a week while in school.
A variety of assessment instruments will have been developed and imposed upon traditional institutions, permitting the for-profit education industry to make the claim that they are providing “exactly the same education” as Cal Poly or the University of Virginia.
But not at all trends are in the direction of such cretinous, self-serving “quality” on the part of administrators and the investor class they so cheerfully serve.
If current trends continue, graduate student employees will have successfully unionized at 60% of public and private institutions (this assumes the reversal of the travesties perpetrated under a Bush-packed National Labor Relations Board).
There will be large undergraduate union locals in various stages of organization in New York, California, Illinois, and Massachusetts, including a couple of dozen with contracts.
Contingent faculty unionization likewise will have reached perhaps 40%, and the demand for pay parity will have been taken up in earnest by the major faculty unions.
Contingent faculty will be the union leadership at half a dozen major faculty unions and have bargained actual pay parity in a few noteworthy cases.
Full-time and part-time contingent faculty alike will have attained steadily increasing degrees of employment security, in many cases representing fairer and more rational systems of employment security than the tenure system.
In short, if current trends continue—and there is little reason to suppose otherwise in the national political agenda—things will get much worse on campus before Emile arrives.
On the other hand, Emile may arrive at a moment when undergraduates are at the heart of a revived American labor movement, an American labor movement with the kind of ambitions it hasn’t had since long before either of his parents were undergraduates.
In short, it probably still won’t be a great time to be on the faculty.
But it’s sure to be one heck of an interesting time to be a smart, committed student interested in taking back the public sphere from the hacks, sleaze artists, and greed peddlers who’ve been running the show for the past thirty years.
Recently:
- Happy Fourth?
- Poverty In Higher Ed
- What I’m Reading Now
- Meet the Trustees, Part 1: Trustees Behind Bars
- They’ll Be Watching You
- Maybe He Can’t
- Academic Labor Bookshelf
- Job Listing #666
- Psst! Forward this Link to Grad Students
- Don’t Miss COCAL VIII
Comments
This entry was posted on Tuesday, February 19th, 2008 at 6:28 pm and is filed under corporate university. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.




Marc’s work is most welcome. In addition to the concentration on faculty working conditions, the intrusion of students’ worklives onto their educational experience is worth ongoing reflection. The etymology of the word school is rooted in the Greek for “leisure,” and, by implication, its wise use. A “liberal” education was, by definition, liberating.
I wrote an article years ago on “Work and liberal Learning” for the Community College Humanities Association review and argued that the hectic, debt and consumer ridden lives of students was a toxic influence on the leisure so needful for real study. Instead, the pace and quality of life is such that schooling is something that’s squeezed into life instead of sipped slowly. Trouble is, same toxic element is present in the life of teaching as well. (Ask veteran teachers to compare their reading assignments with those they were able to give 15 or twenty years ago.)
I wonder how much keeping students “busy” is a way of foreclosing on their political activism.
A completely unscholarly comment, but congratulations and welcome to Emile!
Thanks, New Kid (and to everyone else who’s written privately!)
Grad student organizing efforts (including this week’s march on the Provost’s office) at the University of Chicago were covered by the Chronicle of Higher Education this week.
http://chronicle.com/jobs/blogs/onhiring/474/graduate-students-rally-?commented=1#c000365
Congratulations to the whole family! Perhaps a post on family leave is in order? (http://tinyurl.com/bwxmy)
I worry for my little one too, sometimes, but then I remind myself that’s she’s one of the million good reasons to believe in the most positive of futures for everyone!
Good idea, Jon. And thank you for the reference. The Emile post was a big exception for me–I’ve generally avoided sharing personal experience in my writing about the academy. Still, you’re right about the importance of the topic.
I’ll put it on the pile!
It’s gratifying to see not only that such positive things happen, but that they are being REPORTED.