Frank Donoghue argues that professors of the humanities have already “gone too far to rescue themselves.”
This week’s posts are all inspired by the Rethinking the University: Labor, Knowledge, Value conference in Minneapolis April 11-13. In attendance will be plenty of Minnesota folks, like Paula Rabinowitz and Lisa Disch as well as a great lineup from GSOC-UAW (who have a new book out regarding the landmark strike of graduate employees at NYU), David Downing, Dick Ohmann, Jeff Williams, and many others.
Also in attendance will be Frank Donoghue from Ohio State, whose new book The Last Professors portrays the swift demise of the tenurable minority in the permatemped disciplines, arguing that with respect to silent acquiescence to casualization, “professors of the humanities have already gone too far to rescue themselves.”
This is a vigorous, approachable, and often angry book that seeks to hold the tenurable minority responsible for the steady flowering of multiple tiers of labor—the “new majority” serving contingently as well as graduate employees. To that end, he offers a trenchant critique of the communications of disciplinary associations and graduate program advisors that tend to paint the graduate-employee-as-disposable-worker as the victims of their own bad choices, bad preparation, or bad timing “on the market.” As a result, the relentless “job-market” propaganda and pseudo-knowledge produces a graduate-student subjectivity that willingly self-fashions as a commodity:
This take-charge, self-help approach is perfectly pitched to an audience of job-seekers who have survived graduate school and earned the Ph.D., and who cannot bring themselves to admit that the academic labor system is rigged against them. Instead, they deny it, or, more accurately, they don’t believe that the system will personally victimize them. If they fail, it is because they were “underprepared.” Ideally, they believe that their personal merit and thorough preparation will override the workings of the ‘market.’ … If you believe that success or failure is largely up to you, the job search itself becomes an intense personal drama about individual distinction and merit. (40)
Donoghue goes on to note that the intensified world of competition hardly ends with the job search but continues throughout the life cycle of the tenured minority, noting the sheer unsustainability of speed-up at this level (and, one might add, at wages often much lower than those of nurses, bartenders, and police officers).
The one caveat I’ll raise with Frank this weekend regards the general probem of using “vanishing” tropes. As many have observed, the “vanishing Indian” didn’t actually disappear, but moved to degraded circumstances with a limited purchase on the public sphere. We might say the same for the faculty.
Since future higher education won’t be “professorless,” but filled with faculty—research professors of retail marketing, distinguished chairs in business ethics, but $1000-per-course lecturers in Homer—there will remain opportunities for resistance, for political action, especially by way of activist unions of the faculty serving contingently, including those faculty who serve contingently as graduate employees.
This is the argument of The University Against Itself, the GSOC-NYU collection just released by Temple University Press: corporatization is neither inevitable nor impersonal. It is a matter of human, political, reality that we can make or unmake as we choose–if we choose.
Tomorrow I’ll write about the importance of Jeff Williams’ mantra to “Teach the University,” and perhaps the day after, I’ll say something about my presentation, Extreme Work-Study.
Recently:
- Gallup: Citizens Smarter than NYT and Washington Post on Ed Policy, Again
- Cushy For Whom?
- NYT Offers Dianetics for Higher Ed
- Haiti, Six Months After
- The United States of Alabama
- Hooked on Measurement
- Who’s Teaching Johnny? Hold Administrators Accountable for Student Retention
- High-handed Administrators Generate High Costs
- OMG! DIY U means EM do RTW!!!!
- “Some of the Worst-Paid High-School Graduates in the Country”
Comments
This entry was posted on Monday, April 7th, 2008 at 11:30 am and is filed under "job market theory" and why it's silly, academic labor system, coming attractions, faculty on food stamps, graduate education, intellectuals are workers, youth is a category through which class is lived. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.




Hi - found this post via the Chronicle’s “Brainstorm” and thought I should thank you by visiting your actual blog.
I really appreciate you posting that quote by Frank Donoghue because as a grad student, it never feels like I’m doing enough - there’s always something to be done to further the CV, and it also feels that the need for professors is real. Whether or not universities want to address that need is another question; I’ve argued that tenured professors and administrators who believe in low labor costs have a common incentive in keeping the professoriat exclusive even with increased admissions.
But I do feel like a radical even thinking such things and not having any faith in the system that cared to educate me this far. So I wonder and look for some support for my views, knowing that maybe I’ll change my mind one day and look favorably on things now, but at least my perceptions aren’t so wrong that I’m not seeing anything correctly.
I feel conflicted when I read blogs and research related to the plight of adjuncts.
On the one hand, I feel for the adjuncts. I know that they are not paid very well (I have worked as an adjunct) and I know, for the most part, that they have very little chance of ever finding tenure-track position. On the other hand, most knew (or should have known) of the low pay and lack of opportunities before embarking on their graduate studies – and decided to do it anyway.
In a sense, it is as if they were told that the stove was hot, but touched it anyway.
There are so many academic fields that pay well, and allow one to make a difference in the world and have a wonderful “life of the mind,” why would anyone needlessly chose a humanities degree and lock themselves into a life of poverty and frustration?
online gambling alley
roused rinse carver.